Skip to main content

Strategic Planning

 


We are preparing our new corporate plan. With the end of the next Parliament likely to be in 2020, what is going to be different? What will have changed irrevocably; fundamental shifts that will transform how we view our world. With the Chancellor announcing that another £25bn of cuts is needed in the first two years after the election, there are four key trends that are evident. 

Public services are being dismembered. Assets are being transferred into the private sector rapidly and that is likely to be accelerated after the next election. At the end of 2013, 3,670 schools had become Academy schools. There are no national figures available, but the Local Authority accounts in the county where we work show that school buildings to the value of £40m have been transferred so far. In 2014, 56% of English secondary schools were academies. Primary schools, 11% and growing.

In January 2014, it was estimated that 70% of contracts being awarded by the NHS were going to private

companies.  As an indicator of the future, Peterborough and Stamford NHS Foundation Trust, Britain’s most

indebted NHS foundation trust, has been warned that it is “financially unsustainable”. It will soon be in

discussion with private sector bidders about the take over the management of its’ two hospitals in attempt to

service its PFI debts.


The Right to Buy peaked in 1989, ten years after it’s’ introduction, at 135,701 per annum. Dropped to its

lowest at the end of the last labour government to 3,179 and is on the up again, more than doubling to 8,398.

Various methods are being mooted on how to give tenants the opportunity to own their home – at a cost to

the social rented sector.

Secondly, we need to recognise that 2014 is the end of the period of cheap money. Exceptionally low interest rates have been engineered to help stimulate growth and as western economies start to recover, quantitative easing is already being scaled back. Interest rates will begin rise in 2015 and continue upwards as we approach 2020. This will have a dramatic affect on house prices, particularly in London and the south east. The professional middle classes will be particularly squeezed and vocal. Either priced out of the home ownership market or enticed into taking on more debt with the Help to Buy and struggling to pay the higher interest rate mortgage.

Thirdly, with digital technology, communication channels are growing exponentially. The emphasis has been the undoubted impact on the world of work and effect on organisations. But ever increasing digital communications is rapidly changing personal relationships between people and groups. Where for example, many are predicting that public services could soon be crippled by the ‘ticking time bomb’ of dementia, Telecare and Telehealth hold out huge hope for the future. Empowering individuals to extend their independent life and delay dependence on the state is in everyone’s interest.

Lastly, successive research shows that public support for the benefits system has been in steady decline in recent decades.  The proportion of the general public agreeing that we should spend on benefits for those in poverty fell from 55 per cent in 1987 to 27 per cent in 2009.  84 per cent of people agree that stricter tests are needed to ensure people claiming incapacity benefit are genuinely unable to work. 78 per cent agreed jobseekers should lose some of their benefits if they turn down work. 62 per cent agreed people on benefits should have their payments capped if they choose to have 'many' children. 57 per cent agreed people who receive higher housing benefit because they live in expensive areas should be forced to move into cheaper housing to bring down the benefit bill.

These trends reflect a steady decline in support for the benefits system, with little variation under different governments.

Back to my corporate plan. The housing association of 2020 will need to be robust; financially resilient in the face of hostile environment. It will need to embrace a multitude of communication methods, recognising how they influence relationships but also how different communication routes can be harnessed to enhance lives. The dismemberment of the state into private provision provides great risks but also opportunities for housing associations. Opportunities to provide not just innovation and new services, but also opportunities to show leadership.

The speed, scale and breadth of these changes are unprecedented. Our corporate plan will be about ambition and growth, about quality and support. But it will also be about staying focused on those in need, not abandoning core customers, our tenants. It will be about using our assets and our imagination to deliver services to an increasingly marginalised section of society.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery and the Origins of Social Housing

The horrific death of George Floyd in May 2020 and the subsequent Black Lives Matter movement shone a spotlight on systemic discrimination within organisations. Since then many have been examining their roots to identify whether they are founded on racism. Social housing has that same responsibility, and it may help us understand why racial discrimination persists in current activities and practices.   The Transtlantic Slave Trade saw 12 - 12.5 million people transported from central and west Africa to the Americas where they were put to work growing crops such as sugar, cocoa, coffee, cotton and tobacco. As property, the people were considered merchandise or units of labour, and were sold at markets with other goods and services.   These crops generated vast wealth for many traders in Europe, and from 1769 to 1853 Britain dominated. After the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 the following decades saw slave trading gradually reduce. How could this atrocious period in our history be

This Ole House

Published in Inside Housing: https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/comment/this-ole-house-42273  

Shared Ownership - a housing market fix?

Shared Ownership has given homes to around 180,000 families and it’s claimed that it offers a third way, an opportunity to house many more at a lower cost, another tenure that broadens the landlord offer. Some housing association websites go further and claim “It’s about getting your foot on the housing ladder. It’s a great alternative to renting and perfect if you can’t afford to buy a house outright.” Really? Whilst housing associations like selling them, the experiences of the occupiers can be quite different. Higher entry costs, administrative charges, rents rising annually, plus the responsibility for all repairs can mean the worst of all worlds. Why do increasing numbers feel trapped in the tenure?   “It’s a step on the ladder” , yet Cambridge University found ( 2012 ) that over 12 years only 27,908 had staircased to 100%, and in many rural areas freehold ownership is expressly prohibited. They concluded that many shared owners simply cannot afford to buy their property in full,

How to issue a bond: nine tips for housing associations

Make time This path is so well trodden it is difficult to see over the sides of the trench. The legal documentation has developed over many years so there is virtually no opportunity to change it. In addition, investors need to know heir investment is secure and so satisfactory title must be demonstrated. Depending on the type of organisation and the quality of your records, this can be inordinately difficult. There is no shortcut, so start early. Do your homework The financial world is just that, a different world. Investors will know more about you than you do about them. Most are knowledgeable about housing associations and what they do not know, their in-house analysts will discover. Any credit rating (and Moody’s dominates the market) will be used to verify their analysis and may give comfort that their understanding is correct. And comfort gives confidence. Confidence can lead to a lower rate of interest – but don’t bank on it. Learn the language Coupons aren’t supermarket money-

The Threat to Rural Housing

 

Time catches up with Eric Pickles

  Eric Pickles has been in the news again. He’s a busy man. Almost exactly a decade before his reappearance, I attended ‘Herefordshire 2020: A Vision for the County’, a half day conference in Hereford. It was a brave attempt to demonstrate how the private and public sectors could work together for a positive future. The star of the show was the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, who gave a bizarre and disturbing performance . The theme of Eric Pickles’ speech was that we need to get away from the central control of policy; we need to deregulate and stop the tick box mentality where there are regulations for everything. Make government officials with clipboards get a sense of perspective. On entering his department, he proudly told us, he gave his civil servants his three priorities; localism, localism and localism. “Localism will support growth and growth will support localism”. His confidence grew. To a Parish Councillor trying to achieve change he chided, “Stop

Housing associations should freeze their rents now – or face tenant strikes

  Housing association tenants are more likely to be suffering from social isolation, threats to employment and exposure to Covid-19 in poorly paid jobs. Few realise that they’re also facing a rent hike. This Monday, social landlords increased their rents by 2.7%. Little wonder that pressure is growing to suspend rent payments to ease financial pressures. In countries implementing a lockdown, those renting their home are becoming more vocal on the possibility of rent strikes. Pressure is mounting across the globe and there are demands in Boston and New York in the US, South Australia and Canada . In the UK, rent strikes are being discussed in numerous major cities, notably in Islington in the capital. In Cheltenham, estate agents shop windows have been graffitied with slogans such as “Can’t Pay? Don’t”. One area where there is a greater degree of influence over rents is in housing associations. Following nearly 50 years of subsidy, these are wealthy organisations. In England, their

Storm clouds are looming over Britain’s housing market

  Government intervention has inflated house prices to unsustainable levels; a crash is now predicted - and those on lowest incomes will suffer. The Conservative ideological obsession with home ownership, and antipathy to social housing, blinds them to the need for a balanced housing market that supports the needs of both the poorest and of business. Help to Buy was exposed in June 2019 by the National Audit Office (NAO) and excoriated on Left Foot Forward. It’s worth repeating some of that analysis again, Around three-fifths of those using Help to Buy could have bought a property without it, over 8,000 of those using the scheme had household incomes over £100,000 and more than 20,000 had incomes over £80,000. 1 in 5 of those using Help to Buy aren’t even first-time buyers. It’s boosted the profits of Britain’s biggest property developers. And of course since then, the scheme has been extended to 31st March next year. The NAO noted then that the government had indicated that it “wil

Redefining acceptable conduct: Using social landlords to control behaviour

  Abstract The 1996 Housing Act brought ‘antisocial behaviour’ within the remit of housing legislation for the first time. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. There still remains uncertainty about the exact nature of ‘antisocial’ behaviour. This has implications for the reasons for outlawing it and for the application of this legislation. Using data from the British Crime Survey, it is argued that there is insufficient evidence of a growth in antisocial behaviour. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. What appears to be occurring on local authority housing estates is that a combination of, among other things, high unemployment, high child densities and lack of public funding in community and associated facilities is resulting in higher rates of vandalism. The legislation, in reality, seeks to legitimise opposition to a range of previously acceptable behaviours. For publication click here . For complete pape

Government Strategy - Laying the Foundations

  Unrestrained optimism is our great weakness. Whilst we always want to look on the bright side of life, it’s a risky business, particularly when it leads us to inapt conclusions. The publication of Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England late last year made many commentators, looking for a theme, seem confused. Initially grasping at individual policy initiatives as harbingers of great doom, those commentaries are now giving way to practitioners tunnelling for useful, workable solutions. The Strategy calls for new build of high quality homes, mortgage indemnity that will help some people, there’s some more funding, an increase in the Right to Buy (RtB) to meet ownership aspirations, a commitment to deliver Zero Carbon homes. As ever, there’s little detail on how any of this will be delivered. The early naysayers have taken breath and stepped aside to allow the analysts to translate policy into action and define the new direction of housing policy under a coalition govern