The Tenure that will not Die

Picture a young couple, Jess and Sam. They have spent years diligently saving for a deposit, only to watch house prices skyrocket, far outpacing their wages. Enter shared ownership: the government's much-touted “affordable” solution. Buy a 25% stake in a flat, pay rent on the rest, and supposedly climb the property ladder step by step. It sounds reasonable—until the trap snaps shut.

Shared ownership is marketed as a lifeline for a generation locked out of home ownership. However, peel back the glossy brochures, and you'll uncover a scheme riddled with exploitation, designed not to empower tenants but to enrich developers. This isn’t housing policy—it’s wealth extraction, disguised as social benevolence.

The Illusion of Affordability

Proponents claim shared ownership bridges the gap between renting and owning. The reality? A financial quagmire. Buyers face a triple burden: exorbitant service charges, unpredictable rent hikes (often tied to inflation), and the Sisyphean task of “staircasing” to full ownership. As property values rise, purchasing additional shares becomes impossible for many, trapping them in an ever diminishing lease. Worse, if they can't keep up with rising costs, they risk losing their home altogether—a brutal eviction process akin to private renting.

Then there's the catch-22 of selling. Shared ownership properties are harder to offload, with complex rules and limited buyer pools. Many find themselves stuck in negative equity, their investment crumbling while developers walk away unscathed.

The Profit Pipeline

So why do developers and housing associations champion shared ownership? Follow the money. Under schemes like the Affordable Homes Programme, the government subsidises developers to build “affordable” housing. But here’s the trick: “affordable” is redefined to mean up to 80% of market rates—a meaningless discount in cities where prices have ballooned beyond reason.

Developers pocket the government grants, then sell a fraction of the property at inflated prices. In many cities, a 25% share of a £400,000 flat still costs £100,000—far beyond the reach of many working people. The state covers the gap, socialising the risk, while developers privatise the profit. It’s a rigged system: public funds subsidise private gain, and tenants inherit all the liabilities of home ownership with few of the rights.

A Betrayal of Social Housing

This scam exposes a deeper rot. Decades ago, councils built genuinely affordable social homes—secure, lifelong tenancies with rents tied to income. Today, shared ownership epitomises a core tenet: the state exists to underwrite corporate profits. By funnelling grants into half-baked “affordable” schemes, governments prop up a broken market rather than fix it. The result? A generation squeezed between unaffordable rents and predatory 'shared ownership', while developers laugh all the way to the bank.

The Alternative?

The solution is no mystery: build social housing. Lots of it. Publicly owned, rent-capped, and insulated from speculative greed. But that would require taxing the wealthy and confronting the developer lobby—steps this government is yet to take. Instead, they still peddle shared ownership as a placebo, a distraction from their refusal to dismantle a housing system engineered to fail all but the rich.

Jess and Sam deserve better. They deserve security, dignity, and a home that’s truly theirs—not a financial time bomb wrapped in empty promises. Shared ownership isn’t a policy. It’s a profiteering racket, and it’s time we called it out.

Comments

A National Scandal: Empty Homes and the Housing Crisis

Everyone deserves a safe and secure place to call home. Yet in England today, a growing number of people struggle to access this basic need. While hundreds of thousands of properties sit empty, the housing crisis deepens. A Growing Problem, a Missed Opportunity But there's a glimmer of hope. Studies show that repurposing empty properties could create up to 40,000 affordable homes within four years. It wouldn't solve everything, but it would offer a lifeline to countless individuals on the brink of homelessness. This is a wasted opportunity. No one should face homelessness when solutions exist. Families with children are crammed into single rooms, forced to prepare for work in drafty cars, or uprooted from jobs and support networks due to a lack of affordable options. The government's inaction on empty properties is unacceptable. Long-term empty homes, vacant for over six months, have skyrocketed to over 248,000 – a 24% increase in just six years. This coincides with recor...

Homelessness: A Growing Crisis and the Role of Housing Associations

As homelessness in the United Kingdom continues its relentless rise, reaching over 350,000 , the pressing question remains: why are housing associations (HAs), the wealthiest players in the housing sector, doing so little to stem this tide? With millions of pounds flowing into their coffers annually, housing associations have the financial muscle to make a significant impact. Yet, their contributions to addressing homelessness seem conspicuously limited. HAs have long been a cornerstone of social and affordable housing, managing extensive property portfolios and collecting substantial rental incomes from their tenants. These funds are intended for the maintenance and expansion of housing stock, ensuring that affordable housing remains available to those who need it most. However, a closer examination reveals that the priorities of these associations have shifted over time. The increasing pressure to operate with a business-like efficiency has led housing associations to focus o...

How social landlords must respond to Trump tariff impacts

Economic turmoil will have knock-on impacts for affordable housing supply chains in the UK, but it also presents an opportunity for social landlords to demonstrate resilience, argues Peter Brown Trump's tariff barrage, with a 10% baseline tariff on its goods exports to the US includes a 25% tariff on steel and aluminium imports , materials fundamental to the construction industry. Manufacturing and construction supply chains are directly in the firing line and perhaps more importantly, unforeseen turbulence creates uncertain future costs, risks of contract failure and possibly more company insolvencies. This is no longer a distant concern. How should the sector respond? Decisive action is needed. The potential impact of these tariffs, particularly on steel and aluminium, will ripple through our supply chains, inflating construction costs and jeopardising project viability. Housing organisations, from the largest G15 to the smallest community-led associations, must adopt a war-room...

Will Housing Investment be Pivotal?

Rachel Reeves’ Spring Statement on 26th March is poised to be a defining moment. We stand at a crossroads, with stark choices before us. The Chancellor must resist the siren song of austerity and instead embrace a bold vision of investment, especially in housing, and safeguard the vital safety net of welfare. The idea that we can achieve economic growth by slashing benefits and public spending is not just misguided, it’s downright dangerous. It’s a cruel delusion to think that we can starve the very people who need support the most and somehow expect the economy to flourish. Cutting wages and benefits for the poor, the old, the sick, and the disabled is not just morally reprehensible, it’s economically illiterate. It will only deepen inequality and stifle any hope of real progress. Instead of these shortsighted cuts, Reeves must prioritise investment in social housing. A decent home is not a luxury; it’s a fundamental human right. Building more social housing will not only provid...

1984 and Truth Social

How Orwell’s masterpiece can predict Trumps next steps I decided, with a grim sort of duty, to re-read Orwell. Pulled my old, dog-eared copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four from the shelf, expecting, perhaps, a historical curiosity. A powerful warning, yes, but one whose specific horrors belonged to the mid-20th century, to Stalin and the nascent Cold War fears that birthed it. Instead, I found myself gripped by a chilling, nauseating sense of déjà vu . Page after page wasn't just resonant; it felt like a dispatch from the present. Not the whole terrifying architecture of Airstrip One, not yet. But the tools, the language, the psychological distortions – they leaped off the page, smeared across the news reports from Donald Trump’s second presidency, barely four months old. It’s uncanny, and frankly, terrifying. Orwell wasn't just writing about totalitarianism; he was dissecting the mechanisms by which truth is dismantled and power becomes absolute. And seeing those mechanisms depl...

Climate Change and Housing Inequality: The Vulnerable Bear the Greatest Burden

Climate change affects everyone, but its impacts are far from equal. Across the UK and globally, those living in poor quality housing face the harshest consequences of our changing climate, creating a cruel irony where the people who contributed least to global warming suffer most from its effects. The Heat Island Effect: When Housing Location Becomes Life-Threatening People on low incomes are more likely to live in housing not suited to heat and are twice as likely to live in places that are significantly hotter than neighbouring areas due to the 'urban heat island' effect. This phenomenon means that while affluent neighbourhoods enjoy tree-lined streets and green spaces that naturally cool the air, poorer communities endure concrete jungles that trap and intensify heat. The statistics are stark: around a quarter of the poorest families live in homes that regularly overheat, compared to just one in twenty of the richest households. This isn't simply about comfort—...

Resurgence of In-Office Mandates Jeopardises Employee Wellbeing

The fading memory of Covid-19 has prompted a concerning trend: employers are increasingly abandoning flexible work arrangements and mandating a full-time return to the office. This shift disregards the demonstrated benefits of balanced, hybrid work models and places employee wellbeing at risk. With a staggering proportion of the workforce reporting burnout, the pervasiveness of workplace stress is not in question—only its magnitude. Mental Health: A Critical Workplace Imperative Mental health challenges are neither novel nor exceptional in the modern professional landscape; they are, however, frequently unacknowledged and inadequately addressed. Driven by demanding expectations, the erosion of work-life boundaries, and relentless performance pressures, numerous employees face significant struggles, often in silence. Mounting pressures have culminated in research indicating that a substantial majority of employees have experienced burnout within the past year. Therefore, it is i...

Homing in on the public sector

Published in The Guardian, 8th February 1995

The Rise of Private Renting

Another year, another grotesque symptom of Britain's broken housing market. While families languish on ever-lengthening social housing waiting lists, consigned to the precariousness of private renting, a different story unfolds for a select few. 2024 saw a record surge in the creation of limited companies designed solely to hoover up buy-to-let properties. Sixty thousand of these entities sprouted up last year, a 23% jump from the previous "record" in 2023. Let's be clear: this isn't about providing homes ; it's about financial engineering, about exploiting a system rigged in favour of the propertied class. This isn't some sudden blip, but a deliberate, decade-long trend, turbo-charged since 2018 when the tax rules were conveniently "rewritten" for landlords. Now, nearly 400,000 buy-to-let companies stalk the land, gobbling up homes and turning them into investment vehicles. We're told 70-75% of new buy-to-let purchases are now funnelled...

Housing: creative solutions

Search This Blog