Climate Change and Housing Inequality: The Vulnerable Bear the Greatest Burden

Climate change affects everyone, but its impacts are far from equal. Across the UK and globally, those living in poor quality housing face the harshest consequences of our changing climate, creating a cruel irony where the people who contributed least to global warming suffer most from its effects.

The Heat Island Effect: When Housing Location Becomes Life-Threatening People on low incomes are more likely to live in housing not suited to heat and are twice as likely to live in places that are significantly hotter than neighbouring areas due to the 'urban heat island' effect. This phenomenon means that while affluent neighbourhoods enjoy tree-lined streets and green spaces that naturally cool the air, poorer communities endure concrete jungles that trap and intensify heat. The statistics are stark: around a quarter of the poorest families live in homes that regularly overheat, compared to just one in twenty of the richest households. This isn't simply about comfort—it's about survival. During heatwaves, these poorly ventilated, inadequately insulated homes become furnaces, putting residents at risk of heat stroke, dehydration, and other heat-related illnesses.

The Decade Ahead: Intensifying Extremes The pace of change and clustering of record-breaking extreme weather are far from natural, with a series of prolonged heatwaves hitting various parts of the UK in summer 2025, including traditionally cooler regions like Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. These heatwaves aren't just more frequent—they're more intense, longer-lasting. Climate projections for the next decade paint a troubling picture. The UK can expect more frequent and severe extreme weather events, from devastating floods to unprecedented heatwaves. London is already affected by events such as floods, heatwaves and droughts, and as our climate changes we expect to see an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.

Social Housing: Built for Yesterday's Climate Most social housing was not built with climate change in mind, which means that it will have to be adapted to suit our changing climate. These buildings often lack proper insulation, adequate ventilation, or flood defences, leaving residents exposed to temperature extremes and water damage. The vulnerability extends beyond individual buildings to entire communities. Where communities cannot afford to adopt measures or obtain adequate insurance, it is not possible for them to adequately prepare without outside help. If that help is not effectively provided then it is these communities which are highly likely to see some of the most extreme impacts from future flood and heatwave events.

The Poverty Trap Deepens Research from Anglia Ruskin University reveals that poorer households in the UK are more vulnerable to climate change because temperature shocks are associated with deepening wealth inequality. This creates a vicious cycle: climate impacts make poor households poorer, which in turn makes them more vulnerable to future climate impacts. The global picture is equally alarming. Climate change will drive 68 million-135 million people to poverty by 2030, reversing the decades of economic growth that helped lift millions from extreme poverty and reduced inequalities.

Health Impacts: A Matter of Life and Death The health consequences of poor housing during extreme weather are severe and disproportionate. Age, pre-existing medical conditions and social deprivation are key factors that make people vulnerable, while asthma is more common among some ethnic minority communities and low-income households, and low-income individuals who live in buildings that are older or in poor condition can be exposed to damp indoor environments.

The Path Forward Climate impacts and extreme weather events can affect anyone, but some people will be more affected than others, depending not just on their exposure to the event, but on their social vulnerability – that is, how well they are able to cope with and respond to events like floods and heatwaves. The solution requires urgent action to improve housing quality for the most vulnerable, retrofit social housing for climate resilience, and ensure that adaptation measures reach those who need them most. Without intervention, the next decade will see climate change become an increasingly powerful driver of inequality, with housing quality determining who survives and who suffers.

Housing Improvements and Retrofitting

• Retrofit existing homes to make them resistant and resilient to disasters - retrofitting existing homes is more affordable, better for the environment, and better for homeowners

• Improve insulation and energy efficiency - support social housing providers to insulate social homes, improve energy efficiency and upgrade heating systems

• Install overheating prevention measures - external cladding with light colouring to reflect heat, extraction fans, blinds in the windows on S and W aspects

• Enhance flood resilience - reline existing drainage systems and improved drainage and flood resilience

• Implement water conservation measures - replacement low volume toilets and baths, replacement low flo taps, new low flow showers, water meters

Environmental and Infrastructure Solutions

• Develop green infrastructure - projects that have reduced surface water run-off and local flooding, improved water quality, helped mitigate the urban heat island effect and created wildlife habitats and improved biodiversity

• Create accessible outdoor spaces - ensuring tenants with limited mobility could access the outdoors without fear of slipping in puddles. Open spaces that had previously been fenced off were brought back into use

• Build climate adaptation into all new infrastructure - 75% of the infrastructure needed by 2050 has not been built yet: an unmissable opportunity to address climate adaptation and mitigation

Policy and Financial Support

• Provide targeted financial assistance - support for vulnerable communities who cannot afford adaptation measures on their own

• Implement government adaptation programmes - under the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK is legally required to adapt to climate change. The government is required to produce a climate change risk assessment to identify risks and a five-yearly national adaptation programme

• Ensure affordable access to climate-resilient housing - address barriers that prevent vulnerable populations from accessing safe, adapted housing

• Support social housing providers - provide funding and technical support to retrofit and adapt social housing stock

Health and Community Support

• Address fuel poverty - the effects of fuel poverty can be dangerous, or even deadly — campaign group National Energy Action has linked cold homes to thousands of deaths a year

• Provide healthcare support for climate-related health impacts, particularly for elderly and vulnerable populations

• Ensure equitable access to cooling centres, flood shelters, and other emergency climate services

Long-term Systemic Changes

• Address housing inequality - tackle the root causes that leave vulnerable populations in poor quality housing

• Integrate climate adaptation with social policy - ensure climate adaptation measures address existing inequalities rather than reinforcing them

• Build climate resilience into urban planning - create cities and communities that protect vulnerable populations from climate impacts

• Develop early warning systems - provide vulnerable communities with advance notice of extreme weather events.

These measures require coordinated action across government, housing providers, communities, and international organizations to ensure that those most vulnerable to climate change receive the protection and support they need.

Follow on LinkedIn

Comments

Leadership and Seductive Innovation

Whatever sector, whatever industry you are in, these are challenging times. It is all hands to the pump to find the right course. And for those fearing their very survival, it is understandable that the search for that new, powerful idea should dominate. But success will never lie in new technology alone; it is also critical to look in the right direction, not to get waylaid into seemingly seductive solutions. Look at the business and be honest, are a series of technological innovations likely? And if they are, will they make the impact on your industry that you anticipate? For service organisations in particular, constant technomania is probably an absolute distraction from the core business. Worse, it will beguile you into believing there is a promised land; that there is a magic bullet that will solve the organisation’s problems. The techno-fetishists earn their crust by promoting ever whackier and unachievable ideas. New jobs are being created, innovation labs are springing up. Cha...

Shared Ownership - a housing market fix?

Shared Ownership has given homes to around 180,000 families and it’s claimed that it offers a third way, an opportunity to house many more at a lower cost, another tenure that broadens the landlord offer. Some housing association websites go further and claim “It’s about getting your foot on the housing ladder. It’s a great alternative to renting and perfect if you can’t afford to buy a house outright.” Really? Whilst housing associations like selling them, the experiences of the occupiers can be quite different. Higher entry costs, administrative charges, rents rising annually, plus the responsibility for all repairs can mean the worst of all worlds. Why do increasing numbers feel trapped in the tenure? “It’s a step on the ladder” , yet Cambridge University found ( 2012 ) that over 12 years only 27,908 had staircased to 100%, and in many rural areas freehold ownership is expressly prohibited. They concluded that many shared owners simply cannot afford to buy their property in fu...

Our Housing Crisis: a tale of broken trust

Complaints to the Housing Ombudsman are on an inexorable rise , revealing a festering issue at the core of housing organisations. These repeated failures have seeped into the national consciousness, catching the attention of both the media and concerned citizens. Even politicians, typically ensnared in their own agendas, have been forced to take notice. We yearn for housing to be a central theme during this general election - a #planforhousing that couldn’t be ignored. And the public? Well, they’ve noticed too. Over the past few years, a relentless stream of reports has flooded in, painting a grim picture of subpar living conditions. In this financial year alone, the Housing Ombudsman has censured 48 social housing organisations with the allegation of severe maladministration. The Secretary of State has taken notice, penning stern letters to each offender. But this crisis didn’t emerge overnight. Yes, factors like right-to-buy policies, chronic underfunding, aging housing stock, and th...

Rents Hit Record Highs - it's time for controls

It’s time for an informed debate on rent controls. The laissez-faire, competitive market approach in the privately rented sector has demonstrably failed - as average private rents in Britain have climbed to record highs, renters are suffering and excessively high rents create a drain on the economy. Property website Rightmove has said that in May this year, the typical advertised rent outside London reached a record £1,316 a calendar month. In London it was £2,652 a month – almost three times the £894 asked for in north-east England. Rightmove said the average advertised rent outside London in May was an inflation-busting 7% higher than a year earlier. This leads those in the property industry with a vested interest to argue for an increase in supply. But it’s economically illiterate to believe that simply adding more privately rented housing will bring rents down. We need to look seriously at rent controls. Rent control policies vary widely across European countries, with ...

A National Scandal: Empty Homes and the Housing Crisis

Everyone deserves a safe and secure place to call home. Yet in England today, a growing number of people struggle to access this basic need. While hundreds of thousands of properties sit empty, the housing crisis deepens. A Growing Problem, a Missed Opportunity But there's a glimmer of hope. Studies show that repurposing empty properties could create up to 40,000 affordable homes within four years. It wouldn't solve everything, but it would offer a lifeline to countless individuals on the brink of homelessness. This is a wasted opportunity. No one should face homelessness when solutions exist. Families with children are crammed into single rooms, forced to prepare for work in drafty cars, or uprooted from jobs and support networks due to a lack of affordable options. The government's inaction on empty properties is unacceptable. Long-term empty homes, vacant for over six months, have skyrocketed to over 248,000 – a 24% increase in just six years. This coincides with recor...

Redefining acceptable conduct: Using social landlords to control behaviour

Abstract The 1996 Housing Act brought ‘antisocial behaviour’ within the remit of housing legislation for the first time. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. There still remains uncertainty about the exact nature of ‘antisocial’ behaviour. This has implications for the reasons for outlawing it and for the application of this legislation. Using data from the British Crime Survey, it is argued that there is insufficient evidence of a growth in antisocial behaviour. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. What appears to be occurring on local authority housing estates is that a combination of, among other things, high unemployment, high child densities and lack of public funding in community and associated facilities is resulting in higher rates of vandalism. The legislation, in reality, seeks to legitimise opposition to a range of previously acceptable behaviours. For publication click here . For complete ...

Green Ambitions, Stalling Reality: Can the Market Deliver Clean Energy?

Soaring renewable energy installations masked a harsh truth in 2023: the clean energy transition is faltering. Fossil fuel use continues to climb, with China shouldering most of the renewables burden. China's secret? State-owned companies prioritise national goals over profit, driving massive clean energy projects. The West, reliant on profit-driven private enterprise, struggles. Renewable energy offers modest returns, a stark contrast to traditional energy sources. Intense competition further squeezes profits. Subsidies keep the West's renewables afloat, but don't guarantee strong profits. As the Earth heats inexorably, Governments face a stark choice: accept the failure of the free market for clean energy, or embrace climate catastrophe

It's Not Rocket Science

Don’t believe the hype. Artificial intelligence is neither artificial nor intelligent. While advancements are exciting, a popular form of AI called machine learning is not the key to super intelligence that many claim. Machine learning is like a super pattern recognizer, analysing massive amounts of data to make predictions or complete tasks. It's great for specific things, like writing code or finding rhymes, but it doesn't capture how humans think. The human brain works in a completely different league. We can grasp complex ideas with way less information and come up with explanations, not just describe what's happening. Imagine a child learning grammar - they pick up the rules without needing mountains of data. Machine learning programs can't do this, they're stuck on a more basic way of understanding the world. This limited understanding restricts what machine learning programs can achieve. They can describe situations and even predict what might happen next, ...

8 facts you need to know about welfare reform

8 facts you need to know about welfare reform This blog is simple. It gives facts that contradict commonly held and repeated views. It debunks the myths that we hear regularly. Print it out and keep it near you. MYTH 1. Keeping the rise in benefits to only 1% is fair because it hits shirkers, not workers. Fact: 60% of the reduction falls on in-work households. Why? Because the 1% rise - which equates to a real-terms cut - affects universal benefits like child benefit and tax credits like child tax credit. MYTH 2. Spending on benefits for those out of work is out of control. Fact: the majority of all welfare spending is on pensioners - 53%. Also, benefits for those out of work is less than a quarter of the total welfare budget. Second, on average, between 2000 and 2010, welfare spending grew annually, in real terms, by only 1.75% - compared to 5.5% in the 1950s and 1960s, and 3% in the 1980s. Third, benefit spending in 2011-12 accounted for 10.4% of GDP, lower than the mid-80s ...

The Long Shadow of Austerity

Queues for first council housing in 30 years in Minehead. Courtesy BBC 19th June 2024 There's no doubt that it’s the impact of austerity measures implemented by the Conservative Government since 2010 that have disproportionately affected the most vulnerable, exacerbating inequality and poverty. Key areas impacted include public services, welfare benefits, and job security. Austerity has led to increased reliance on food banks, higher levels of debt, and greater mental health issues. And since the First World War the wealth gap has never been so wide. Policy changes are desperately needed to prioritise social protection and equitable economic recovery.

Housing: creative solutions

Search This Blog