Climate Change and Housing Inequality: The Vulnerable Bear the Greatest Burden

Climate change affects everyone, but its impacts are far from equal. Across the UK and globally, those living in poor quality housing face the harshest consequences of our changing climate, creating a cruel irony where the people who contributed least to global warming suffer most from its effects.

The Heat Island Effect: When Housing Location Becomes Life-Threatening People on low incomes are more likely to live in housing not suited to heat and are twice as likely to live in places that are significantly hotter than neighbouring areas due to the 'urban heat island' effect. This phenomenon means that while affluent neighbourhoods enjoy tree-lined streets and green spaces that naturally cool the air, poorer communities endure concrete jungles that trap and intensify heat. The statistics are stark: around a quarter of the poorest families live in homes that regularly overheat, compared to just one in twenty of the richest households. This isn't simply about comfort—it's about survival. During heatwaves, these poorly ventilated, inadequately insulated homes become furnaces, putting residents at risk of heat stroke, dehydration, and other heat-related illnesses.

The Decade Ahead: Intensifying Extremes The pace of change and clustering of record-breaking extreme weather are far from natural, with a series of prolonged heatwaves hitting various parts of the UK in summer 2025, including traditionally cooler regions like Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. These heatwaves aren't just more frequent—they're more intense, longer-lasting. Climate projections for the next decade paint a troubling picture. The UK can expect more frequent and severe extreme weather events, from devastating floods to unprecedented heatwaves. London is already affected by events such as floods, heatwaves and droughts, and as our climate changes we expect to see an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.

Social Housing: Built for Yesterday's Climate Most social housing was not built with climate change in mind, which means that it will have to be adapted to suit our changing climate. These buildings often lack proper insulation, adequate ventilation, or flood defences, leaving residents exposed to temperature extremes and water damage. The vulnerability extends beyond individual buildings to entire communities. Where communities cannot afford to adopt measures or obtain adequate insurance, it is not possible for them to adequately prepare without outside help. If that help is not effectively provided then it is these communities which are highly likely to see some of the most extreme impacts from future flood and heatwave events.

The Poverty Trap Deepens Research from Anglia Ruskin University reveals that poorer households in the UK are more vulnerable to climate change because temperature shocks are associated with deepening wealth inequality. This creates a vicious cycle: climate impacts make poor households poorer, which in turn makes them more vulnerable to future climate impacts. The global picture is equally alarming. Climate change will drive 68 million-135 million people to poverty by 2030, reversing the decades of economic growth that helped lift millions from extreme poverty and reduced inequalities.

Health Impacts: A Matter of Life and Death The health consequences of poor housing during extreme weather are severe and disproportionate. Age, pre-existing medical conditions and social deprivation are key factors that make people vulnerable, while asthma is more common among some ethnic minority communities and low-income households, and low-income individuals who live in buildings that are older or in poor condition can be exposed to damp indoor environments.

The Path Forward Climate impacts and extreme weather events can affect anyone, but some people will be more affected than others, depending not just on their exposure to the event, but on their social vulnerability – that is, how well they are able to cope with and respond to events like floods and heatwaves. The solution requires urgent action to improve housing quality for the most vulnerable, retrofit social housing for climate resilience, and ensure that adaptation measures reach those who need them most. Without intervention, the next decade will see climate change become an increasingly powerful driver of inequality, with housing quality determining who survives and who suffers.

Housing Improvements and Retrofitting

• Retrofit existing homes to make them resistant and resilient to disasters - retrofitting existing homes is more affordable, better for the environment, and better for homeowners

• Improve insulation and energy efficiency - support social housing providers to insulate social homes, improve energy efficiency and upgrade heating systems

• Install overheating prevention measures - external cladding with light colouring to reflect heat, extraction fans, blinds in the windows on S and W aspects

• Enhance flood resilience - reline existing drainage systems and improved drainage and flood resilience

• Implement water conservation measures - replacement low volume toilets and baths, replacement low flo taps, new low flow showers, water meters

Environmental and Infrastructure Solutions

• Develop green infrastructure - projects that have reduced surface water run-off and local flooding, improved water quality, helped mitigate the urban heat island effect and created wildlife habitats and improved biodiversity

• Create accessible outdoor spaces - ensuring tenants with limited mobility could access the outdoors without fear of slipping in puddles. Open spaces that had previously been fenced off were brought back into use

• Build climate adaptation into all new infrastructure - 75% of the infrastructure needed by 2050 has not been built yet: an unmissable opportunity to address climate adaptation and mitigation

Policy and Financial Support

• Provide targeted financial assistance - support for vulnerable communities who cannot afford adaptation measures on their own

• Implement government adaptation programmes - under the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK is legally required to adapt to climate change. The government is required to produce a climate change risk assessment to identify risks and a five-yearly national adaptation programme

• Ensure affordable access to climate-resilient housing - address barriers that prevent vulnerable populations from accessing safe, adapted housing

• Support social housing providers - provide funding and technical support to retrofit and adapt social housing stock

Health and Community Support

• Address fuel poverty - the effects of fuel poverty can be dangerous, or even deadly — campaign group National Energy Action has linked cold homes to thousands of deaths a year

• Provide healthcare support for climate-related health impacts, particularly for elderly and vulnerable populations

• Ensure equitable access to cooling centres, flood shelters, and other emergency climate services

Long-term Systemic Changes

• Address housing inequality - tackle the root causes that leave vulnerable populations in poor quality housing

• Integrate climate adaptation with social policy - ensure climate adaptation measures address existing inequalities rather than reinforcing them

• Build climate resilience into urban planning - create cities and communities that protect vulnerable populations from climate impacts

• Develop early warning systems - provide vulnerable communities with advance notice of extreme weather events.

These measures require coordinated action across government, housing providers, communities, and international organizations to ensure that those most vulnerable to climate change receive the protection and support they need.

Follow on LinkedIn

Comments

Leadership and Seductive Innovation

Whatever sector, whatever industry you are in, these are challenging times. It is all hands to the pump to find the right course. And for those fearing their very survival, it is understandable that the search for that new, powerful idea should dominate. But success will never lie in new technology alone; it is also critical to look in the right direction, not to get waylaid into seemingly seductive solutions. Look at the business and be honest, are a series of technological innovations likely? And if they are, will they make the impact on your industry that you anticipate? For service organisations in particular, constant technomania is probably an absolute distraction from the core business. Worse, it will beguile you into believing there is a promised land; that there is a magic bullet that will solve the organisation’s problems. The techno-fetishists earn their crust by promoting ever whackier and unachievable ideas. New jobs are being created, innovation labs are springing up. Cha...

Homing in on the public sector

Published in The Guardian, 8th February 1995

Homelessness: A Growing Crisis and the Role of Housing Associations

As homelessness in the United Kingdom continues its relentless rise, reaching over 350,000 , the pressing question remains: why are housing associations (HAs), the wealthiest players in the housing sector, doing so little to stem this tide? With millions of pounds flowing into their coffers annually, housing associations have the financial muscle to make a significant impact. Yet, their contributions to addressing homelessness seem conspicuously limited. HAs have long been a cornerstone of social and affordable housing, managing extensive property portfolios and collecting substantial rental incomes from their tenants. These funds are intended for the maintenance and expansion of housing stock, ensuring that affordable housing remains available to those who need it most. However, a closer examination reveals that the priorities of these associations have shifted over time. The increasing pressure to operate with a business-like efficiency has led housing associations to focus o...

1984 and Truth Social

How Orwell’s masterpiece can predict Trumps next steps I decided, with a grim sort of duty, to re-read Orwell. Pulled my old, dog-eared copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four from the shelf, expecting, perhaps, a historical curiosity. A powerful warning, yes, but one whose specific horrors belonged to the mid-20th century, to Stalin and the nascent Cold War fears that birthed it. Instead, I found myself gripped by a chilling, nauseating sense of déjà vu . Page after page wasn't just resonant; it felt like a dispatch from the present. Not the whole terrifying architecture of Airstrip One, not yet. But the tools, the language, the psychological distortions – they leaped off the page, smeared across the news reports from Donald Trump’s second presidency, barely four months old. It’s uncanny, and frankly, terrifying. Orwell wasn't just writing about totalitarianism; he was dissecting the mechanisms by which truth is dismantled and power becomes absolute. And seeing those mechanisms depl...

How social landlords must respond to Trump tariff impacts

Economic turmoil will have knock-on impacts for affordable housing supply chains in the UK, but it also presents an opportunity for social landlords to demonstrate resilience, argues Peter Brown Trump's tariff barrage, with a 10% baseline tariff on its goods exports to the US includes a 25% tariff on steel and aluminium imports , materials fundamental to the construction industry. Manufacturing and construction supply chains are directly in the firing line and perhaps more importantly, unforeseen turbulence creates uncertain future costs, risks of contract failure and possibly more company insolvencies. This is no longer a distant concern. How should the sector respond? Decisive action is needed. The potential impact of these tariffs, particularly on steel and aluminium, will ripple through our supply chains, inflating construction costs and jeopardising project viability. Housing organisations, from the largest G15 to the smallest community-led associations, must adopt a war-room...

Shared Ownership - a housing market fix?

Shared Ownership has given homes to around 180,000 families and it’s claimed that it offers a third way, an opportunity to house many more at a lower cost, another tenure that broadens the landlord offer. Some housing association websites go further and claim “It’s about getting your foot on the housing ladder. It’s a great alternative to renting and perfect if you can’t afford to buy a house outright.” Really? Whilst housing associations like selling them, the experiences of the occupiers can be quite different. Higher entry costs, administrative charges, rents rising annually, plus the responsibility for all repairs can mean the worst of all worlds. Why do increasing numbers feel trapped in the tenure? “It’s a step on the ladder” , yet Cambridge University found ( 2012 ) that over 12 years only 27,908 had staircased to 100%, and in many rural areas freehold ownership is expressly prohibited. They concluded that many shared owners simply cannot afford to buy their property in fu...

Redefining acceptable conduct: Using social landlords to control behaviour

Abstract The 1996 Housing Act brought ‘antisocial behaviour’ within the remit of housing legislation for the first time. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. There still remains uncertainty about the exact nature of ‘antisocial’ behaviour. This has implications for the reasons for outlawing it and for the application of this legislation. Using data from the British Crime Survey, it is argued that there is insufficient evidence of a growth in antisocial behaviour. This legislation is directed exclusively at those living in council housing. What appears to be occurring on local authority housing estates is that a combination of, among other things, high unemployment, high child densities and lack of public funding in community and associated facilities is resulting in higher rates of vandalism. The legislation, in reality, seeks to legitimise opposition to a range of previously acceptable behaviours. For publication click here . For complete ...

8 facts you need to know about welfare reform

8 facts you need to know about welfare reform This blog is simple. It gives facts that contradict commonly held and repeated views. It debunks the myths that we hear regularly. Print it out and keep it near you. MYTH 1. Keeping the rise in benefits to only 1% is fair because it hits shirkers, not workers. Fact: 60% of the reduction falls on in-work households. Why? Because the 1% rise - which equates to a real-terms cut - affects universal benefits like child benefit and tax credits like child tax credit. MYTH 2. Spending on benefits for those out of work is out of control. Fact: the majority of all welfare spending is on pensioners - 53%. Also, benefits for those out of work is less than a quarter of the total welfare budget. Second, on average, between 2000 and 2010, welfare spending grew annually, in real terms, by only 1.75% - compared to 5.5% in the 1950s and 1960s, and 3% in the 1980s. Third, benefit spending in 2011-12 accounted for 10.4% of GDP, lower than the mid-80s ...

Will Housing Investment be Pivotal?

Rachel Reeves’ Spring Statement on 26th March is poised to be a defining moment. We stand at a crossroads, with stark choices before us. The Chancellor must resist the siren song of austerity and instead embrace a bold vision of investment, especially in housing, and safeguard the vital safety net of welfare. The idea that we can achieve economic growth by slashing benefits and public spending is not just misguided, it’s downright dangerous. It’s a cruel delusion to think that we can starve the very people who need support the most and somehow expect the economy to flourish. Cutting wages and benefits for the poor, the old, the sick, and the disabled is not just morally reprehensible, it’s economically illiterate. It will only deepen inequality and stifle any hope of real progress. Instead of these shortsighted cuts, Reeves must prioritise investment in social housing. A decent home is not a luxury; it’s a fundamental human right. Building more social housing will not only provid...

Who should cast the first stone?

Published in The Guardian 18th April 1998

Housing: creative solutions

Search This Blog