While economists clutch their spreadsheets and politicians claim "steady growth," the real economy is screaming warnings that almost nobody wants to hear. The signals are there, hiding in plain sight: in the cardboard boxes piling up at recycling centres, in the lipstick tubes sliding across checkout counters. And they're both pointing toward the same grim destination—a housing market collapse that will make 2008 look like a dress rehearsal.
UK house prices fell 0.3% in September, erasing August's gains and bringing the average home to £298,184. The Halifax tries to spin this as "broadly stable," but stability is precisely what we don't have. What we have is a market teetering on the edge, propped up by nothing more substantial than collective delusion and the desperate hope that somehow, this time, the fundamentals don't matter.
Here's what does matter: the economy that underpins housing demand is crumbling, and the establishment indicators you've been taught to trust are looking in entirely the wrong direction. GDP figures, unemployment rates, inflation data—these are lagging indicators, rearview mirrors that tell you about crashes you've already had. By the time they register a recession, families have already lost their homes.
The alternative indicators—dismissed as quirky curiosities by the economic priesthood—are actually far more revealing. Alan Greenspan, who chaired the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades, tracked cardboard box demand as a measure of real-time economic activity. Why? Because close to 75-80% of all non-durable goods are shipped in corrugated cardboard containers. When box orders fall, it means companies expect weaker consumer demand. It's that simple, that brutal, and that predictive.
And what's happening now? The U.S. has shed about 9% of its containerboard production capacity in about eight months—about twice as much as during the 2009 recession. International Paper reported U.S. box shipments fell about 5% year-on-year in the second quarter, its fourth consecutive quarterly decline. This isn't noise in the data. This is an air raid siren.
Then there's the Lipstick Index. Coined by Estée Lauder's Leonard Lauder, it tracks how consumers shift to small affordable luxuries during economic stress. When people start buying £20 lipsticks instead of handbags or holidays, they're signalling economic anxiety while trying to maintain some semblance of normalcy. During the 2008 global financial crisis, cosmetics sales jumped 4.4% even as the economy tanked. These "little pick-me-ups" are actually distress signals.
Now connect the dots. Consumer demand is weakening. Production is falling. People are clutching at small comforts while abandoning big purchases. And what's the biggest purchase most people will ever make? Property. What happens when the economic engine that's supposed to drive housing demand starts sputtering?
Affordability remains a challenge, with only relatively lower mortgage rates and steady wage growth supporting buyer confidence. But mortgage rates aren't falling fast enough, wages aren't rising fast enough, and confidence—that most fragile of economic ingredients—is evaporating. When recession hits, and the cardboard and lipstick indices suggest it's not a question of if but when, that confidence will shatter completely.
Housing markets don't decline gracefully. They cascade. Falling demand leads to falling prices. Falling prices lead to negative equity. Negative equity leads to repossessions. Repossessions lead to forced sales. Forced sales accelerate price falls. And house building? Builders breaking ground on new homes signal confidence that buyers are ready. When that confidence disappears, construction doesn't slow—it stops.
The tragedy is that none of this is inevitable in the sense of being natural or necessary. It's inevitable only because we've built an economic system that lurches from bubble to crash, enriching speculators while devastating ordinary families. We've treated housing as a commodity rather than a right, and now we're going to reap what we've sown.
The cardboard boxes are trying to tell us something. So are the lipstick sales. The question is whether we're willing to listen, or whether we'll keep trusting the official statistics until the roof quite literally falls in.
Comments
Post a Comment